Invitation: Apply for Writing-Intensive Curriculum Design Studio
Spring 2027
DEADLINE: January 15, 2027
The Writing Institute will offer Writing-Intensive Curriculum Design Studio again in Spring Term. We invite DSAS departments who are interested in designing or re-designing W-Intensive courses to meet their programmatic goals and/or General Education commitments to consider sending a team (2 or more from your department) to participate in this program. Participants earn a stipend upon completion of the program.
About the Program
Writing is a powerful mode of inquiry. Students who write frequently—in any discipline—not only develop strong writing skills but also extend their thinking and propel their learning. The University of Pittsburgh was one of the first in the nation to recognize and promote the value of writing in the disciplines. Since 1981, the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of School of Arts and Sciences has offered writing-intensive courses in every academic major. Dietrich School students must complete two writing-intensive courses, one in their major field of study, in order to fulfill the General Education Requirements.
This program is for administrators who are
- concerned about the efficacy of their department’s writing-intensive course,
- would like their writing-intensive course to better support the learning outcomes that they have identified for their majors,
- are eager to offer a writing-intensive course that will enhance their students’ work in the major and their preparation for professional life after Pitt,
- aware of obstacles that are preventing the effective implementation of the writing requirement for their majors, or
- are currently offering a one-credit writing-intensive course and are eager to bring their department into compliance with the DSAS writing-intensive requirement (three credits of writing-intensive instruction in the major)
Who participates?
You will propose at least two participants from your department. Participants might include a Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department Chairs, or other administrative parties who coordinate, review, assign, and perhaps design W courses in the Department and who are responsible for participating in or coordinating curricular decisions at the program level.
How will the program work?
The group will meet on four occasions in the spring term to review existing curricula; to devise new or revised programmatic learning outcomes for W courses in the program or department; to discuss the role that the W courses will offer to benefit the program and students in the program; and to address challenges that might emerge in the delivery of the newly designed curricula. We will organize discrete Zoom and in-person options, depending on the cohort’s limitations or needs, to ensure that the group can meet regularly. Your team will have some work to do between meetings with the cohort.
We can accommodate several Departments in the cohort.
Participants who complete the program will each earn a stipend of $1200. To receive the payment, faculty must be under contract with the University of Pittsburgh.
What is the Application Process and Deadline?
You are the best judge of who in your department would need to be involved in this process in order to successfully conceptualize and implement curriculum design. Teams must include at least two individuals.
To apply, email a brief proposal to writing-institute@pitt.edu by January 15th. Please include the names and roles of all proposed participants, the course or courses that will be the focus of the design work, and a brief description (no more than 300 words) of what your department hopes to gain from this opportunity for undergraduate students taking writing-intensive courses in your department.
Note: If your department’s proposal does not come directly from your department chair, we will check with them to be sure that your department is prepared to work on and implement curriculum design.
After Curriculum Design Studio
After you complete the Design Studio, the Writing Institute can further support your department’s efforts to offer undergraduates excellent writing instruction. We can develop faculty-oriented workshops tailored to your specific needs in the summer months or in the following academic year. Here are some of the possibilities:
- We offer consultations with faculty (one-on-one or small groups) responsible for designing or adapting existing courses to align with curricular designs that emerge from Departmental participation in the Design Studio.
- Your faculty members can enroll in our Writing in the Disciplines Seminar to design courses in alignment with the new / re-designed curricula.
- The Writing Institute can develop tailored workshops for design and redesign of courses in a particular program or department to move from new design / redesign to adaptation and delivery (learning outcome driven to alignment with assignments and assessments) for faculty assigned to teach the course(s) (especially for those who have already taken the WID Seminar as an extension of this work).
Not ready to participate now? We expect to offer Curriculum Design Studio again in Spring 2028.
Testimonials from Past Participants
David Fraser: Neuroscience
Participant 2023-2024 & 2024-2025
The Writing Design studio has been a tremendous help in the process of redesigning our writing practicum course. Some of the benefits are quite practical, such as carving out a dedicated time to work on the project, syncing us with the Writing Center resources, or working on the design for “bite-sized” peer review assignments. Other elements of the studio are broader and more conceptual, like hearing how other departments have solved similar problems and working to understand the role our course plays in fulfilling departmental level curricular objectives. Dr. Keating has been a master facilitator, thoughtful collaborator, and wonderful colleague throughout the journey!
Kimberly Carter-Fenk: Chemistry
Participant 2024-2025
My work in the Writing Intensive Curriculum Design Studio has challenged me to think more broadly about the disciplinary writing skills that students should be able to demonstrate upon graduation and how to scaffold learning outcomes throughout the undergraduate Chemistry curriculum. I initially struggled to identify cohesive learning goals and outcomes; through feedback, I reorganized programmatic learning goals and outcomes to better facilitate scaffolding writing instruction throughout the major. Additionally, I identified low-stakes assignments and exercises that students could complete throughout their one-semester long capstone writing experience to lessen the extent of stress and uncertainty in their research paper preparation.
Rika Asai: Music
Participant: 2024-2025
I appreciate the structure of the program, which has given us time and tools to focus on the role of writing in our department’s undergraduate curriculum. We have been able to use your [Keating] expertise to better understand how to audit our curriculum, which we quickly realized was a first step we had not considered when we applied to the program! Although we broadly “know” writing is central to our vision of a curriculum that places music within a comprehensive humanistic approach, it has been helpful to have ideas for concrete steps forward as we improve the efficacy of our existing courses and revise/develop new ones.
Mark Paterson: Sociology
Participant 2022-2024
Although our department (Sociology) had been wanting to re-evaluate our undergraduate curriculum for several years, it wasn’t until a group of us including the DUGS, the Adviser, and the Chair committed our time to the Design Studio that this process properly started for us. The ideas we encountered, including from colleagues in other departments, started turning our wheels powerfully but slowly. Almost two years later, the momentum is still there and we are continuing to implement some major changes to our UG curriculum as a direct result. This was great timing for us, sure, but any department who takes writing assignments seriously (which should be all of them) would benefit in both short-term and long-term ways.